FIX WHAT'S STOPPING
GOOGLE FROM SHOWING YOUR SITE.

Technical fixes produce visible ranking movement within 1-2 weeks for blocked-page and redirect corrections. Structural changes — site speed, internal linking, crawl optimization — take 4-8 weeks to reflect fully in Google's rankings.

• •Blocked-page and redirect corrections produce ranking changes within 1-2 weeks of implementation.
• •Site speed and structural improvements take 4-8 weeks to reach full ranking impact.
• •Comprehensive technical overhauls show compounding results across 2-3 months as Google reprocesses the entire site.

A one-time technical audit costs $2,500-$5,000. Ongoing technical SEO support runs $2,000-$5,000 per month. 2 factors determine pricing: site size (page count) and platform complexity.

• •Small business sites under 500 pages start at $2,500 for a focused audit with prioritized fix list.
• •Larger sites or e-commerce platforms with thousands of pages run $4,000-$7,500 for a comprehensive audit.
• •Ongoing monthly support for implementation guidance, fix verification, and monitoring runs $2,000-$5,000/month.

4 symptoms indicate hidden technical problems: key pages missing from Google's index, slow mobile load times, traffic drops after a redesign, and SEO investments that produce no ranking improvements despite good content.

• •Key pages absent from Google's index after 3+ months live signals crawl or indexation barriers.
• •Mobile load times above 3 seconds on core service pages cost both rankings and conversions.
• •Traffic drops after a website redesign point to redirect failures, missing pages, or indexation rule errors.
• •Ranking stagnation despite consistent content investment indicates structural issues blocking authority flow.

The audit identifies the 5-15 issues that are actively costing your business rankings and revenue — not a 90-page PDF of 200+ warnings sorted by error count. Every recommendation includes a plain-language explanation, a priority rank, and implementation guidance.

• •Prioritization follows revenue impact per fix, not raw error counts or automated severity labels.
• •Recommendations include plain-language explanations of what the issue costs and what the fix produces.
• •Involvement continues through implementation and verification — the engagement does not end at the diagnosis.

2 basic tasks are manageable with free tools: reviewing Google Search Console error reports and checking page speed scores. Fixing redirect chains, resolving duplicate content, restructuring internal links, and diagnosing crawl budget waste require specialized SEO tools and expertise.

• •Google Search Console surfaces basic indexation errors and page speed scores at no cost.
• •Redirect chains, duplicate content resolution, and crawl optimization require professional-grade crawling tools and SEO interpretation.
• •DIY technical SEO carries a high misdiagnosis risk — fixing low-severity errors while ignoring the 3-5 issues that actually suppress rankings.

A technical SEO engagement delivers 4 outputs: a diagnosis of structural problems from Google's perspective, a prioritized fix list ordered by revenue impact, implementation support for your developer, and post-fix verification confirming ranking improvements.

• •A technical audit document ranking every finding by severity and estimated business impact.
• •A prioritized implementation plan with developer-ready instructions for each fix.
• •Post-implementation validation confirming each fix was applied correctly and indexation improved.
• •Plain-language explanations for every recommendation — no unexplained error codes or jargon.

Both. The engagement covers diagnosis, implementation guidance, and post-fix verification. 2 delivery models exist: advisory (I guide your developer through each fix) and hands-on (I write tickets, prioritize sprints, and verify the rollout directly).

• •Advisory engagements provide implementation-ready instructions your developer follows independently.
• •Hands-on engagements include ticket writing, sprint prioritization, and direct developer collaboration.
• •Post-fix verification confirms each implementation went live correctly — no assumptions, only measured confirmation.

Yes. Each platform — Shopify, WordPress, Next.js, Webflow — creates a distinct set of technical SEO problems that generic audit tools miss. JavaScript frameworks introduce rendering issues, client-side routing breaks crawlability, and platform-specific defaults override SEO settings.

• •JavaScript frameworks (Next.js, React, Vue) create rendering issues that prevent Google from processing page content.
• •Platform-specific defaults in Shopify, WordPress, and Webflow override SEO settings in ways generic audits do not detect.
• •Recommendations are tailored to your exact platform stack — not generic advice applied identically to every CMS.